Q: Nearly everyone who has played a Halo game knows it was one of the best games invented, and the same goes for Mario games. But why don't they share their games to eachother, would they not be the perfect team? If Nintendo shared with Microsoft, the Wii could maybe get a bit of Halo, the Wii would suit it because of its sensor bar stuff. And if the 360 got a bit of Mario, not everyone likes the flicking stuff and it doesn't use any aiming or anything. So both of those companies could make heaps of people happier, including themselves considering how much money they'd make. Please tell me if you agree or not, and please give a reason for your answer.
A: Microsoft is famous for issuing people faulty hardware. "Micro-tendo" or "Ninten-soft" would definitely drop the Nintendo half. Mario was adopted from Atari. Many people think it was donkey Kong that started Mario, THATS FALSE. The Atari did. Microsoft would definitely take Mario away and then fly away with it's higher graphics unless the Nintendo half would make helmets for the next console. I doubt Nintendo would want to risk Mario, the high profile game Nintendo releases every 2 months. This should not happen. Nintendo has innovative game-play while Microsoft will pown with the graphics. that does sound like an ultimate team, but Microsoft will try to dominate it and eventually take over. Sony seems to be on the side because they release consoles at ridiculous prices. Most likely it would die out if it destroys home brew. Microsoft has a handheld to look forward to and more upgrades on vista, so it's here to stay. Nintendo lags in the graphics department but is easily affordable and innovative, so that will stay as well. this shows a war and no alliance any time soon. however there are a few ds titles that have a Microsoft logo during their start up, possibly a sign of alliance.